The reproduction of a record or an enlargement or facsimile of the reproduction, when satisfactorily identified, is as admissible in evidence as the original, whether the original is in existence or not, if any business, institution, member of a profession or calling, or any department or agency of government, in the regular course of business or activity, has:
(A)kept or recorded any memorandum, writing, entry, print, representation or combination thereof of any act, transaction, occurrence or event; and
(B)caused any or all of the same to be recorded, copied or reproduced by any photographic, photostatic, microfilm, microcard, miniature photographic, or other process, which appears to accurately reproduce or form a durable medium for reproducing the original,
The introduction of a reproduced record, enlargement, or facsimile does not preclude admission of the original.
Comments
COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS
Stylistic changes were made to this rule to conform with the 2007 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The rule was also amended to make it more consistent with federal practice.
Section (a) adopts language from Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6), except that the reference to “a certification that complies with [Federal Rule of Evidence] 902(11) or (12)” was replaced with “by other means as may be provided by statute.” While the majority of states permit authentication of domestic or foreign business records by a certification under 902(11) or (12), this jurisdiction does not currently permit it.
Section (b) adopts language from Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8). Section (c) maintains the Superior Court practice of permitting photographic copies.